🪄Cut the Fluff: Be an emotional detective


Cut the Fluff is a weekly newsletter that will help you become a confident editor. If this was sent to you, subscribe here so you don't miss the next lesson.

Hey Reader,

People think editing is all about words.

Cutting words, adding words, moving words around.

But editing is so much more than that...

To me, editing is about feeling.

Why?

Because the best writing makes you feel something. Educated, empowered, inspired, curious, delighted.

If readers aren't feeling what they're meant to, you haven't done your job as a writer.

So, your first question when you run an edit should be:

"Does this make me feel the way I intended?"

And your second question should be:

"Will the reader feel this way, too?"

Once you've accomplished this, then and only then do things like word choice, sentence structure, redundancy, and all that copy editing goodness come into play.

I think people write off editing because they assume it's a check-the-box exercise. But really, it's a check-the-feeling exercise.

This is why, when you edit, you need to be an emotional detective:

  • What's the reader going through in their life?
  • What are they struggling with?
  • What makes them happy?
  • What pisses them off?
  • What do they want?
  • What do they need?
  • Where do they want to be?
  • What's holding them back?
  • What limiting beliefs do they have?
  • What does their inner critic have to say about it?

It's hard to get this right on a first draft.

Because often, we're so embedded in what we're writing that we assume the reader is on the exact same page.

So we write sentences like:

"Capture readers’ attention and inspire them in ways they didn’t know were possible."

If I'm a new writer trying to learn how actually to get people to read my stuff, this doesn't speak to me. It goes right over my head. It's unspecific, unmemorable (ironically), and makes me feel...nothing.

So, say you wrote this sentence. During a self-edit, ask yourself out loud: "Will the reader feel inspired by this sentence?"

Hopefully, the answer is an objective "no."

Here's how we can edit it to light up emotions:

"Capture readers' attention by creating content that's actually interesting to read. Be anti-generic. Share your unique experiences. Dare to be bold, authentic, YOU. This is the best way to turn skeptical readers into loyal fans."

Can you feel the difference?

Obviously, this needs way more context and a ton of details on how to actually do it.

But the first sentence makes you feel like you're in a real-life cliché. While the second one hits on wants and needs, speaks to things that piss them off, and paints a way through.

So, put your detective hat on. I promise it'll help make your writing more memorable.

Cheers,

Erica

PS: Long to Short drops in a few days...

In my new course, I’ll walk you through exactly how to get 50+ social post ideas from a 1000-word piece of content.

It's my shortest, most affordable, and most actionable course yet.

Want this power?

​Register your interest here.​

Heads up, I'm gonna email you more than usual this week during the launch :)

​

Erica Schneider

​

​

Cut the Fluff

Learn to edit words like a pro. I've edited 3M+ words and each week, I share a lesson to teach you what to cut, how to add value, and how to finally feel confident when editing. Every subscriber gets access to my Editing Library, a database of 62 edits broken down by the problem, my take on how to improve it, and my edited version.

Read more from Cut the Fluff

Hey Reader, Look, today's newsletter isn't about whether we should or shouldn't be using AI in our writing. I have thoughts on that. [You can read them here.] I'm on the side where AI isn't going anywhere, and I absolutely love using it as a creative thought partner. I think it's great for creativity and your thought sparring process, but I also understand the arguments against it. That debate? We could have it all day. That's not what this is about. Today's newsletter assumes AI is here to...

Hey Reader, I've reached my "alright, F this, I gotta say something" moment. I've had enough of holier-than-thou writers claiming a monopoly on thinking. Yes, writing is a form of thinking. But you know what else is? Voice note rambling about something I’ve been thinking about in my head for long enough that I’m ready to write about it, but don’t feel like spending 3 hours grinding through the writing process.I felt like this BEFORE AI. I mean, you know editors existed before AI, right?!Trust...

Hey Reader, If you've been spiraling about "doing content right" on LinkedIn, you're playing the wrong game entirely. (It's a game, by the way.) Some people are optimizing for reach, impressions, and audience growth. Others are optimizing for inbound, starting conversations with the right people, and reputation growth. These people should not be creating the same types of content because they have wildly different goals. Different game. Different rules. Different outcomes. (Aside: Follower...